[Optimizing hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborn infants]. 1997

K Welzl-Müller, and K Böheim, and K Stephan, and H Schlögel, and A Stadlmann, and D Nekahm
Universitäts-Klinik für Hör-, Stimm- und Sprachstörungen, Universität Innsbruck.

One of the major drawbacks using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) for hearing screening in newborn infants is the high fail rate in normal-hearing children. The purpose of the present study was to improve the overall performance of the test procedure and reduce of the fail rate. Improvement was obtained by 3 modifications: (1) change of the pass criterion in healthy newborns by requiring TEOAEs in at least one ear and nor both ears, (2) performing the test only after the second post-partum day, and (3) using a second-stage screening prior to hospital discharge in newborns who failed the initial test. In all, 3980 newborns from 2 well-baby clinics and 243 newborns from a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were screened using an system ILO-88 system program mode quick-check test was completed in 3820 infants. Considering these modifications, the pass rate of healthy newborns was improved from 79.5% to > 99%, and only 0.7% of the false negative (healthy) newborns required further audiological evaluation. Babies from the NICU failed in 3.8% of the screening tests. Overall, the number of newborns who failed the ILO-88 screening test was significantly reduced and the fail rate minimize when compared to previously published experiences with TEOAEs in new-born hearing screening.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007231 Infant, Newborn An infant during the first 28 days after birth. Neonate,Newborns,Infants, Newborn,Neonates,Newborn,Newborn Infant,Newborn Infants
D007363 Intensive Care Units, Neonatal Hospital units providing continuing surveillance and care to acutely ill newborn infants. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit,Neonatal Intensive Care Units,Newborn Intensive Care Unit,Newborn Intensive Care Units,ICU, Neonatal,Neonatal ICU,Newborn ICU,Newborn Intensive Care Units (NICU),ICU, Newborn,ICUs, Neonatal,ICUs, Newborn,Neonatal ICUs,Newborn ICUs
D008297 Male Males
D012016 Reference Values The range or frequency distribution of a measurement in a population (of organisms, organs or things) that has not been selected for the presence of disease or abnormality. Normal Range,Normal Values,Reference Ranges,Normal Ranges,Normal Value,Range, Normal,Range, Reference,Ranges, Normal,Ranges, Reference,Reference Range,Reference Value,Value, Normal,Value, Reference,Values, Normal,Values, Reference
D003638 Deafness A general term for the complete loss of the ability to hear from both ears. Deafness Permanent,Hearing Loss Permanent,Prelingual Deafness,Deaf Mutism,Deaf-Mutism,Deafness, Acquired,Hearing Loss, Complete,Hearing Loss, Extreme,Acquired Deafness,Complete Hearing Loss,Deafness, Prelingual,Extreme Hearing Loss,Permanent, Deafness,Permanent, Hearing Loss,Permanents, Deafness
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000367 Age Factors Age as a constituent element or influence contributing to the production of a result. It may be applicable to the cause or the effect of a circumstance. It is used with human or animal concepts but should be differentiated from AGING, a physiological process, and TIME FACTORS which refers only to the passage of time. Age Reporting,Age Factor,Factor, Age,Factors, Age
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity
D015997 Neonatal Screening The identification of selected parameters in newborn infants by various tests, examinations, or other procedures. Screening may be performed by clinical or laboratory measures. A screening test is designed to sort out healthy neonates (INFANT, NEWBORN) from those not well, but the screening test is not intended as a diagnostic device, rather instead as epidemiologic. Infant, Newborn, Screening,Newborn Infant Screening,Newborn Screening,Neonatal Screenings,Newborn Infant Screenings,Newborn Screenings,Screening, Neonatal,Screening, Newborn,Screening, Newborn Infant,Screenings, Neonatal,Screenings, Newborn,Screenings, Newborn Infant

Related Publications

K Welzl-Müller, and K Böheim, and K Stephan, and H Schlögel, and A Stadlmann, and D Nekahm
January 2013, B-ENT,
K Welzl-Müller, and K Böheim, and K Stephan, and H Schlögel, and A Stadlmann, and D Nekahm
February 1990, The Laryngoscope,
K Welzl-Müller, and K Böheim, and K Stephan, and H Schlögel, and A Stadlmann, and D Nekahm
January 2005, Pro-fono : revista de atualizacao cientifica,
K Welzl-Müller, and K Böheim, and K Stephan, and H Schlögel, and A Stadlmann, and D Nekahm
October 2005, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology,
K Welzl-Müller, and K Böheim, and K Stephan, and H Schlögel, and A Stadlmann, and D Nekahm
January 2007, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology,
K Welzl-Müller, and K Böheim, and K Stephan, and H Schlögel, and A Stadlmann, and D Nekahm
February 1990, Laryngo- rhino- otologie,
K Welzl-Müller, and K Böheim, and K Stephan, and H Schlögel, and A Stadlmann, and D Nekahm
April 1993, British journal of audiology,
K Welzl-Müller, and K Böheim, and K Stephan, and H Schlögel, and A Stadlmann, and D Nekahm
May 1997, The Journal of pediatrics,
K Welzl-Müller, and K Böheim, and K Stephan, and H Schlögel, and A Stadlmann, and D Nekahm
December 2000, Anales espanoles de pediatria,
K Welzl-Müller, and K Böheim, and K Stephan, and H Schlögel, and A Stadlmann, and D Nekahm
August 1997, Ear and hearing,
Copied contents to your clipboard!