-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Automated medical communication systems for patient care usually enhance timeliness and retrievability. The effect of automated systems on communication quality has not been sufficiently measured. The radiology reports produced with the automated radiology reporting system at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were evalueate for quality and compared to reports produced by dictation. No differences in quality between computer-generated and dictated reports were detected by three consultant radiologists using a specially designed quality rating system.
Related Publications
D W Simborg, and
E J Krajci, and
P S Wheeler, and
J N Gitlin, and
K S Goldstein
February 2005,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
D W Simborg, and
E J Krajci, and
P S Wheeler, and
J N Gitlin, and
K S Goldstein
January 1982,
Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique,
D W Simborg, and
E J Krajci, and
P S Wheeler, and
J N Gitlin, and
K S Goldstein
April 2021,
JCO clinical cancer informatics,
D W Simborg, and
E J Krajci, and
P S Wheeler, and
J N Gitlin, and
K S Goldstein
June 1975,
CRC critical reviews in bioengineering,
D W Simborg, and
E J Krajci, and
P S Wheeler, and
J N Gitlin, and
K S Goldstein
February 1989,
Journal of digital imaging,
D W Simborg, and
E J Krajci, and
P S Wheeler, and
J N Gitlin, and
K S Goldstein
May 1988,
Der Radiologe,
D W Simborg, and
E J Krajci, and
P S Wheeler, and
J N Gitlin, and
K S Goldstein
March 2004,
Academic radiology,
D W Simborg, and
E J Krajci, and
P S Wheeler, and
J N Gitlin, and
K S Goldstein
November 2019,
European radiology,
D W Simborg, and
E J Krajci, and
P S Wheeler, and
J N Gitlin, and
K S Goldstein
May 1982,
Radiology,
D W Simborg, and
E J Krajci, and
P S Wheeler, and
J N Gitlin, and
K S Goldstein
February 1985,
Radiology,
