A panel of immunological parameters has been examined in a group of dry-cleaning workers (n = 21) and in a control group of administrators (n = 16) from the same plant. The results were also compared to long-term laboratory reference values (LRV) (n = 14-311). External exposure to tetrachloroethylene (PER) was represented by TWA (8 h) values in the range 11-752 mg PER/m3. Biological monitoring showed an amount from 9 to 344 mg PER/m3 in exhaled air by the end of workshift. 1. The exposed dry-cleaning workers compared to the controls from the plant had statistically significant changes in metabolic activity of phagocytes, alpha 2-macroglobulin, C3 and C4 complement component, salivary secretory IgA, and blastic transformation test. Most of the values were within the range of normal values. 2. The exposed dry-cleaning workers had several abnormal immune parameters compared to the long-term laboratory values (LRV) especially in the alpha 2-macroglobulin, C3 and percentage of T-lymphocytes. Most of the changes, even those that were statistically significant, were still within the range of normal values, but they might be classified as trends or shifts away from normal (spontaneous blastic transformation, absolute number of phagocyting cells, coeruloplasmin, circulating immunocomplexes, serum lysozyme). 3. The non-exposed controls from the same plant showed both quantitative and qualitative differences when compared to the LRV. Changes were seen in IgG, C4, CSI and in increased spontaneous metabolic activity of leucocytes, total leucocyte count, absolute number of phagocyting cells, alpha 2-macroglobulin, prealbumin, C4, circulating immunocomplexes and serum lysozyme. 4. The distribution analysis of all results detected a large number of abnormal values in both groups, more in the at-risk group. 5. As inhalation was the main route of PER exposure it was concluded that the changes might represent aspects of the response of the respiratory immune system, mainly of the alveolar macrophages. Additional postinfection effects could not be excluded in both studied groups. Individual differences in immune reactivity as well as individual range of exposure should be taken into consideration.