Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography: receiver operating characteristic comparison with screen-film chest radiography. 1998

S J Swensen, and G L Aughenbaugh, and L R Brown, and G F Harms, and P R Karsell, and J E Gray, and D M Ilstrup, and D O Hodge
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that the advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) imaging system is superior to conventional chest radiography in the demonstration of diffuse infiltrative lung disease, emphysema, pulmonary nodules, calcification within nodules, and mediastinal or hilar masses and lymphadenopathy. METHODS The study involved 115 patients, each of whom underwent chest computed tomography (CT), AMBER, posteroanterior chest radiography, and conventional posteroanterior stereoscopic chest radiography (two films). All radiographs were obtained with the InSight Thoracic Imaging System. Four chest radiologists independently analyzed the 115 AMBER studies, 115 unpaired single conventional radiographs (a single film from a stereoscopic pair), and 115 stereoscopic conventional radiographs (2 films) for the presence of diffuse infiltrative lung disease, emphysema, pulmonary nodules, calcification within nodules, and mediastinal or hilar masses and lymphadenopathy. For each abnormality detected, the radiologists described their level of confidence based on a scale of 1 to 5. The 115 CT examinations were interpreted by consensus among 3 of the chest radiologists. The CT results were considered the standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) techniques were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS No statistically significant differences were found with ROC techniques between the AMBER system and single or stereoscopic conventional screen-film radiography for the abnormalities studied. CONCLUSIONS We noted no clinically significant difference between AMBER and either single or stereoscopic conventional screen-film radiography in this prospective study of 115 patients in which CT (performed within 1 week of both radiographic examinations) was the standard.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008171 Lung Diseases Pathological processes involving any part of the LUNG. Pulmonary Diseases,Disease, Pulmonary,Diseases, Pulmonary,Pulmonary Disease,Disease, Lung,Diseases, Lung,Lung Disease
D011446 Prospective Studies Observation of a population for a sufficient number of persons over a sufficient number of years to generate incidence or mortality rates subsequent to the selection of the study group. Prospective Study,Studies, Prospective,Study, Prospective
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D012372 ROC Curve A graphic means for assessing the ability of a screening test to discriminate between healthy and diseased persons; may also be used in other studies, e.g., distinguishing stimuli responses as to a faint stimuli or nonstimuli. ROC Analysis,Receiver Operating Characteristic,Analysis, ROC,Analyses, ROC,Characteristic, Receiver Operating,Characteristics, Receiver Operating,Curve, ROC,Curves, ROC,ROC Analyses,ROC Curves,Receiver Operating Characteristics
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity
D013902 Radiography, Thoracic X-ray visualization of the chest and organs of the thoracic cavity. It is not restricted to visualization of the lungs. Thoracic Radiography,Radiographies, Thoracic,Thoracic Radiographies
D014057 Tomography, X-Ray Computed Tomography using x-ray transmission and a computer algorithm to reconstruct the image. CAT Scan, X-Ray,CT Scan, X-Ray,Cine-CT,Computerized Tomography, X-Ray,Electron Beam Computed Tomography,Tomodensitometry,Tomography, Transmission Computed,X-Ray Tomography, Computed,CAT Scan, X Ray,CT X Ray,Computed Tomography, X-Ray,Computed X Ray Tomography,Computerized Tomography, X Ray,Electron Beam Tomography,Tomography, X Ray Computed,Tomography, X-Ray Computer Assisted,Tomography, X-Ray Computerized,Tomography, X-Ray Computerized Axial,Tomography, Xray Computed,X Ray Computerized Tomography,X Ray Tomography, Computed,X-Ray Computer Assisted Tomography,X-Ray Computerized Axial Tomography,Beam Tomography, Electron,CAT Scans, X-Ray,CT Scan, X Ray,CT Scans, X-Ray,CT X Rays,Cine CT,Computed Tomography, Transmission,Computed Tomography, X Ray,Computed Tomography, Xray,Computed X-Ray Tomography,Scan, X-Ray CAT,Scan, X-Ray CT,Scans, X-Ray CAT,Scans, X-Ray CT,Tomographies, Computed X-Ray,Tomography, Computed X-Ray,Tomography, Electron Beam,Tomography, X Ray Computer Assisted,Tomography, X Ray Computerized,Tomography, X Ray Computerized Axial,Transmission Computed Tomography,X Ray Computer Assisted Tomography,X Ray Computerized Axial Tomography,X Ray, CT,X Rays, CT,X-Ray CAT Scan,X-Ray CAT Scans,X-Ray CT Scan,X-Ray CT Scans,X-Ray Computed Tomography,X-Ray Computerized Tomography,Xray Computed Tomography
D018401 Sample Size The number of units (persons, animals, patients, specified circumstances, etc.) in a population to be studied. The sample size should be big enough to have a high likelihood of detecting a true difference between two groups. (From Wassertheil-Smoller, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 1990, p95) Sample Sizes,Size, Sample,Sizes, Sample

Related Publications

S J Swensen, and G L Aughenbaugh, and L R Brown, and G F Harms, and P R Karsell, and J E Gray, and D M Ilstrup, and D O Hodge
December 1994, Investigative radiology,
S J Swensen, and G L Aughenbaugh, and L R Brown, and G F Harms, and P R Karsell, and J E Gray, and D M Ilstrup, and D O Hodge
January 1997, Academic radiology,
S J Swensen, and G L Aughenbaugh, and L R Brown, and G F Harms, and P R Karsell, and J E Gray, and D M Ilstrup, and D O Hodge
April 1993, Radiology,
S J Swensen, and G L Aughenbaugh, and L R Brown, and G F Harms, and P R Karsell, and J E Gray, and D M Ilstrup, and D O Hodge
October 1988, Radiology,
S J Swensen, and G L Aughenbaugh, and L R Brown, and G F Harms, and P R Karsell, and J E Gray, and D M Ilstrup, and D O Hodge
September 1993, Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987),
S J Swensen, and G L Aughenbaugh, and L R Brown, and G F Harms, and P R Karsell, and J E Gray, and D M Ilstrup, and D O Hodge
March 2005, Radiology,
S J Swensen, and G L Aughenbaugh, and L R Brown, and G F Harms, and P R Karsell, and J E Gray, and D M Ilstrup, and D O Hodge
August 1994, Investigative radiology,
S J Swensen, and G L Aughenbaugh, and L R Brown, and G F Harms, and P R Karsell, and J E Gray, and D M Ilstrup, and D O Hodge
October 1988, Radiology,
S J Swensen, and G L Aughenbaugh, and L R Brown, and G F Harms, and P R Karsell, and J E Gray, and D M Ilstrup, and D O Hodge
March 1998, Academic radiology,
S J Swensen, and G L Aughenbaugh, and L R Brown, and G F Harms, and P R Karsell, and J E Gray, and D M Ilstrup, and D O Hodge
December 1985, Journal of thoracic imaging,
Copied contents to your clipboard!