1. In mice pretreated chronically with cocaine (indirect dopamine agonist: 10 mg/kg, s.c. on alternating days for 15 days), haloperidol (dopamine D2 antagonist: 0.3 mg/kg i.p.) exerted an enhanced cataleptic response, but SCH23390 (dopamine D1 antagonist: 0.3 mg/kg i.p.) produced an attenuated response at 24 h, which converted to a supernormal response, when it was administered 15-60 days after withdrawal from cocaine. 2. A challenge dose of SCH23390 exhibited enhanced catalepsy when given 15 days, but not at 24 h, after the last pretreatment dose of SCH23390 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg s.c.). In contrast, haloperidol catalepsy was not affected by the SCH23390 pretreatment. 3. However, in animals chronically pretreated with haloperidol (0.1-1.0 mg/kg s.c.), a challenge dose of SCH23390 as well as haloperidol exhibited attenuated cataleptic effects at 24 h and normal cataleptic responses at 15 days after the last dose of the pretreatment regimen. 4. Challenge doses of haloperidol or SCH23390 given to mice 24 h after chronic cocaine pretreatment produced enhanced and attenuated cataleptic responses, respectively; however, these responses were no longer produced when haloperidol or SCH23390 was given to mice pretreated chronically with a combination of cocaine and either haloperidol or SCH23390. 5. The enhanced catalepsy produced by a challenge dose of SCH23390 (15-60 days after chronic cocaine) was further potentiated when it was administered to animals that had been pretreated chronically with a combination of SCH23390 and cocaine, but was antagonized in animals pretreated chronically with haloperidol and cocaine. In contrast, the degree of enhanced cataleptic responses produced by a challenge dose of haloperidol 30-60 days after pretreatment chronically with a combination of cocaine + SCH23390 was similar to that seen after chronic cocaine alone. However, this enhanced response was antagonized in animals that had been pretreated chronically with the combination of cocaine + haloperidol. 6. The results suggest that the coadministration of SCH23390 with cocaine was able to block indirectly dopamine D2 receptor inhibition (subsensitivity) induced during the early withdrawal period from chronic cocaine, despite the fact that by itself SCH23390 did not have an effect on haloperidol catalepsy. Accordingly, the stimulatory effects of dopamine D2 receptors by a single administration of cocaine may be mediated mainly by an indirect stimulation of dopamine D2 receptor function via its D1 receptor stimulating action. 7. The coadministration of SCH23390 with cocaine rather aggravate the subsensitive effect of dopamine D1 receptors (increased SCH23390 catalepsy) produced during long-term withdrawal period from chronic cocaine, but did not affect that of the dopamine D2 receptor. On the other hand, the coadministration of haloperidol with cocaine normalized both D1 and D2 receptor subsensitive effect. 8. These result suggest that a single administration of SCH23390 or haloperidol after long-term withdrawal periods from chronic cocaine may not be effective as antipsychotic drugs because of further aggravation of suppressive behaviors. These results also provide evidence that D2 receptor antagonists may be more effective as antipsychotic drugs than dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, since the coadministration of haloperidol with cocaine normalized the abnormal behaviors seen during early and long-term withdrawal periods from chronic cocaine.