Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a new and most powerful technique to treat severe forms of human infertility. While the follow-up studies have not shown an increased malformation risk so far, the genetic implications of ICSI are still not fully understood. For this reason, many institutions routinely recommend or even enforce invasive prenatal tests after successful intracytoplasmic sperm injection. We have counselled 107 women pregnant through ICSI about prenatal diagnosis. Sixty-five had already received genetic counselling prior to the treatment (group 1), while 42 had not attended our clinic before (group 2). They were free to choose between invasive and non-invasive diagnosis or no prenatal tests at all. Fifty-four per cent of these patients had an indication for prenatal karyotyping or other invasive procedures independent of ICSI. Only 17 per cent of the total cohort made use of amniocentesis or fetal blood sampling, 82 per cent opted for non-invasive tests (ultrasound, serum screening), and one couple did not wish any prenatal studies. The preference for non-invasive procedures was stronger in group 1 (94 per cent) than in group 2 (65 per cent). We suggest that if patients pregnant through ICSI have the option to choose freely between invasive and non-invasive prenatal tests, they strongly favour the latter.