Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a challenging diagnostic problem because it mimics other cardiopulmonary disorders. Pulmonary angiography is still the reference standard for diagnosing PE but it is costly, invasive and not readily available. Non-invasive diagnostic strategies have therefore been developed to forego pulmonary angiography in patients suspected of having PE. Ventilation/perfusion lung scanning is, at present, the most widely used non-invasive diagnostic test for PE. A high probability ventilation/perfusion scan (segmental or greater perfusion defects with normal ventilation) warrants the institution of anticoagulant therapy especially when paired with high clinical suspicion of PE. Yet, only a minority of patients with confirmed PE have high probability ventilation/perfusion scans. Ventilation/perfusion abnormalities other than those of the high probability scan should be regarded as non-diagnostic. Under these circumstances, documentation of deep vein thrombosis by non-invasive leg testing warrants anticoagulation without the need for angiography. However, a single negative venous study result does not permit to rule out PE in patients with non-diagnostic ventilation/perfusion scans. Results of a recent prospective study indicate that accurate diagnosis or exclusion of PE is possible with perfusion lung scanning alone (without ventilation imaging). Combining perfusion lung scanning with clinical assessment helps to restrict the need for angiography to a minority of patients with suspected PE.