-transparent.png){kind=logo}
The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of two-dimensional (2D) MR subtraction angiography of lower extremities in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease with conventional angiography as the standard of reference. Twenty patients were prospectively included. 2D subtraction MR angiography (MRA) consisted of multisection gradient-recalled echo (GRE) acquisitions with the shortest TE available on our machine (4 msec), obtained in the coronal plane before and after intravenous bolus administration of gadolinium chelate. MR images were reconstructed after subtraction with a maximum-pixel-intensity-projection (MIP) algorithm. MRA was performed in all cases 1-4 days before diagnostic angiography. In a prospective blinded analysis, the number and location of significant (ie, >50%) stenoses and occlusions were evaluated for each vascular segment. Sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate MRA data. Significant stenoses (38 of 46, 83%) and occlusions (66 of 67, 99%) seen at conventional angiography were identified with MRA. The sensitivity and specificity of MRA for determination of stenoses >50% or occlusions was 100% and 97%, respectively. The location and extent of stenoses and/or occlusions on MRA and angiograms were well correlated (kappa values, r = .73, P < .05). Contrast 2D MR subtraction angiography, by providing comparable information to that of conventional angiography, is well suited to evaluate the presence and severity of atherosclerotic lesions of the lower limbs.
J P Laissy, and
M P Debray, and
D Menegazzo, and
A S Rangheard, and
H Benamer, and
P Charlier, and
E Schouman-Claeys
January 2000,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
J P Laissy, and
M P Debray, and
D Menegazzo, and
A S Rangheard, and
H Benamer, and
P Charlier, and
E Schouman-Claeys
March 2006,
La Radiologia medica,
J P Laissy, and
M P Debray, and
D Menegazzo, and
A S Rangheard, and
H Benamer, and
P Charlier, and
E Schouman-Claeys
January 2013,
Radiology,
J P Laissy, and
M P Debray, and
D Menegazzo, and
A S Rangheard, and
H Benamer, and
P Charlier, and
E Schouman-Claeys
March 1991,
Radiology,
J P Laissy, and
M P Debray, and
D Menegazzo, and
A S Rangheard, and
H Benamer, and
P Charlier, and
E Schouman-Claeys
June 2006,
Radiology,
J P Laissy, and
M P Debray, and
D Menegazzo, and
A S Rangheard, and
H Benamer, and
P Charlier, and
E Schouman-Claeys
December 1981,
Surgical neurology,
J P Laissy, and
M P Debray, and
D Menegazzo, and
A S Rangheard, and
H Benamer, and
P Charlier, and
E Schouman-Claeys
August 2016,
European radiology,
J P Laissy, and
M P Debray, and
D Menegazzo, and
A S Rangheard, and
H Benamer, and
P Charlier, and
E Schouman-Claeys
October 2002,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
J P Laissy, and
M P Debray, and
D Menegazzo, and
A S Rangheard, and
H Benamer, and
P Charlier, and
E Schouman-Claeys
June 2010,
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI,
J P Laissy, and
M P Debray, and
D Menegazzo, and
A S Rangheard, and
H Benamer, and
P Charlier, and
E Schouman-Claeys
May 2005,
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology,
