[Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for clinical staging of prostate cancer: encouraging preliminary results]. 1998

O Reerink, and B J Chaplin, and W Meinhardt, and S Horenblas
Nederlands Kanker Instituut/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, afd. Urologie, Amsterdam.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the results of the first 72 laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissections in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS Retrospective study of records. METHODS Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. METHODS A retrospective study of records provided data on 72 patients with prostate cancer staged by laparoscopic lymph node dissection in the period 1993-1997. Per- and postoperative complications, operation time, number of removed lymph nodes, pathology result and duration of hospital stay were assessed. A comparison was made between the first series of 36 patients and the second series. RESULTS In 9 patients the laparoscopic approach was converted to a laparotomy. This occurred six times in the first series of 36 patients and three times in the second series. The postoperative course was complicated six times in the first and four times in the second series. With increasing experience the mean operation time decreased from 140 min to 114 min in the second series (p < 0.0001). The mean number of nodes removed was equal in both series (7.5). Lymph node metastases were found in 20 patients (28%). Hospital stay was 2.9 days in the first series and 2.2 days in the second series (not significant). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection is a minimally invasive method for staging patients with prostate cancer. This staging procedure is of great benefit in patients scheduled for treatment with curative intent because of its accuracy and low morbidity. With increasing experience operation time, hospital stay and number of complications decrease.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007902 Length of Stay The period of confinement of a patient to a hospital or other health facility. Hospital Stay,Hospital Stays,Stay Length,Stay Lengths,Stay, Hospital,Stays, Hospital
D008197 Lymph Node Excision Surgical excision of one or more lymph nodes. Its most common use is in cancer surgery. (From Dorland, 28th ed, p966) Lymph Node Dissection,Lymphadenectomy,Dissection, Lymph Node,Dissections, Lymph Node,Excision, Lymph Node,Excisions, Lymph Node,Lymph Node Dissections,Lymph Node Excisions,Lymphadenectomies,Node Dissection, Lymph,Node Dissections, Lymph
D008207 Lymphatic Metastasis Transfer of a neoplasm from its primary site to lymph nodes or to distant parts of the body by way of the lymphatic system. Lymph Node Metastasis,Lymph Node Metastases,Lymphatic Metastases,Metastasis, Lymph Node
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009367 Neoplasm Staging Methods which attempt to express in replicable terms the extent of the neoplasm in the patient. Cancer Staging,Staging, Neoplasm,Tumor Staging,TNM Classification,TNM Staging,TNM Staging System,Classification, TNM,Classifications, TNM,Staging System, TNM,Staging Systems, TNM,Staging, Cancer,Staging, TNM,Staging, Tumor,System, TNM Staging,Systems, TNM Staging,TNM Classifications,TNM Staging Systems
D010535 Laparoscopy A procedure in which a laparoscope (LAPAROSCOPES) is inserted through a small incision near the navel to examine the abdominal and pelvic organs in the PERITONEAL CAVITY. If appropriate, biopsy or surgery can be performed during laparoscopy. Celioscopy,Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures,Peritoneoscopy,Surgical Procedures, Laparoscopic,Laparoscopic Assisted Surgery,Laparoscopic Surgery,Laparoscopic Surgical Procedure,Procedure, Laparoscopic Surgical,Procedures, Laparoscopic Surgical,Surgery, Laparoscopic,Surgical Procedure, Laparoscopic,Celioscopies,Laparoscopic Assisted Surgeries,Laparoscopic Surgeries,Laparoscopies,Peritoneoscopies,Surgeries, Laparoscopic,Surgeries, Laparoscopic Assisted,Surgery, Laparoscopic Assisted
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D011471 Prostatic Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the PROSTATE. Cancer of Prostate,Prostate Cancer,Cancer of the Prostate,Neoplasms, Prostate,Neoplasms, Prostatic,Prostate Neoplasms,Prostatic Cancer,Cancer, Prostate,Cancer, Prostatic,Cancers, Prostate,Cancers, Prostatic,Neoplasm, Prostate,Neoplasm, Prostatic,Prostate Cancers,Prostate Neoplasm,Prostatic Cancers,Prostatic Neoplasm
D012086 Reoperation A repeat operation for the same condition in the same patient due to disease progression or recurrence, or as followup to failed previous surgery. Revision, Joint,Revision, Surgical,Surgery, Repeat,Surgical Revision,Repeat Surgery,Revision Surgery,Joint Revision,Revision Surgeries,Surgery, Revision

Related Publications

O Reerink, and B J Chaplin, and W Meinhardt, and S Horenblas
January 2007, Khirurgiia,
O Reerink, and B J Chaplin, and W Meinhardt, and S Horenblas
January 1999, The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York,
O Reerink, and B J Chaplin, and W Meinhardt, and S Horenblas
April 1995, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery,
O Reerink, and B J Chaplin, and W Meinhardt, and S Horenblas
January 1994, European urology,
O Reerink, and B J Chaplin, and W Meinhardt, and S Horenblas
May 1994, The Journal of urology,
O Reerink, and B J Chaplin, and W Meinhardt, and S Horenblas
January 2003, Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology,
O Reerink, and B J Chaplin, and W Meinhardt, and S Horenblas
May 1995, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association,
O Reerink, and B J Chaplin, and W Meinhardt, and S Horenblas
March 1992, The Journal of urology,
O Reerink, and B J Chaplin, and W Meinhardt, and S Horenblas
October 2006, Urology,
O Reerink, and B J Chaplin, and W Meinhardt, and S Horenblas
November 1992, Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960),
Copied contents to your clipboard!