A worldwide, phase III, randomized, controlled, safety and efficacy study of a sirolimus/cyclosporine regimen for prevention of acute rejection in recipients of primary mismatched renal allografts. 2001

A S MacDonald, and
Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

BACKGROUND Despite the various immunosuppressive regimens presently in use, acute rejection in the early postoperative period continues to occur in 20 to 40% of renal transplant patients. In a double-blind, multicentred study, we investigated the ability of two different doses of sirolimus (rapamycin, RAPAMUNE), a new class of immunosuppressant that blocks cell cycle progression, to prevent acute rejection in recipients of primary mismatched renal allografts when added to a regimen of cyclosporine (cyclosporin A, CsA) and corticosteroids. METHODS Between October 1996 and September 1997, 576 recipients of primary mismatched cadaveric or living donor renal allografts were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1 ratio (before the transplant operation) to receive an initial loading dose of either 6 or 15 mg of orally administered sirolimus, followed by a daily dose of either 2 or 5 mg/day, or to receive a matched placebo. All groups received cyclosporine (microemulsion formula, CsA) and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was a composite of first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death during the first 6 months after transplantation. Safety data were monitored by an independent drug safety monitoring board. RESULTS Based on an intention-to-treat analysis of 576 patients, there were no significant differences in patient demographic or baseline characteristics among treatment groups. The overall rate of the primary composite endpoint for the 6-month period after transplantation was 30.0% (68/227) in the 2 mg/day sirolimus group and 25.6% (56/219) in the 5 mg/day sirolimus group, significantly lower than the 47.7% (62/130) in the placebo group (P=0.002, P<0.001, respectively). During this period, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 24.7% (56/227) in the 2 mg/day sirolimus group and 19.2% (42/219) in the 5 mg/day sirolimus group, compared with 41.5% (54/130) in the placebo group (P=0.003, P<0.001, respectively), representing a significant reduction in acute rejection of 40.5 and 53.7%, respectively. The need for antibody therapy to treat the first episode of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was significantly reduced in the 5 mg/ day sirolimus group (3.2%) compared to the placebo group (8.5%; P=0.044). The results 1 year after transplantation were similar for the efficacy parameters studied. Adverse events and infections occurred in all groups. CONCLUSIONS The addition of either 2 mg/day sirolimus or 5 mg/day sirolimus to CsA/corticosteroid therapy significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes in primary mismatched renal allograft recipients, without an increase in immunosuppressant-related side effects, including infections and malignancy, at 6 months and at 1 year after transplantation.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D002102 Cadaver A dead body, usually a human body. Corpse,Cadavers,Corpses
D004311 Double-Blind Method A method of studying a drug or procedure in which both the subjects and investigators are kept unaware of who is actually getting which specific treatment. Double-Masked Study,Double-Blind Study,Double-Masked Method,Double Blind Method,Double Blind Study,Double Masked Method,Double Masked Study,Double-Blind Methods,Double-Blind Studies,Double-Masked Methods,Double-Masked Studies,Method, Double-Blind,Method, Double-Masked,Methods, Double-Blind,Methods, Double-Masked,Studies, Double-Blind,Studies, Double-Masked,Study, Double-Blind,Study, Double-Masked
D005260 Female Females
D006084 Graft Rejection An immune response with both cellular and humoral components, directed against an allogeneic transplant, whose tissue antigens are not compatible with those of the recipient. Transplant Rejection,Rejection, Transplant,Transplantation Rejection,Graft Rejections,Rejection, Graft,Rejection, Transplantation,Rejections, Graft,Rejections, Transplant,Rejections, Transplantation,Transplant Rejections,Transplantation Rejections
D006650 Histocompatibility Testing Identification of the major histocompatibility antigens of transplant DONORS and potential recipients, usually by serological tests. Donor and recipient pairs should be of identical ABO blood group, and in addition should be matched as closely as possible for HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS in order to minimize the likelihood of allograft rejection. (King, Dictionary of Genetics, 4th ed) Crossmatching, Tissue,HLA Typing,Tissue Typing,Crossmatchings, Tissue,HLA Typings,Histocompatibility Testings,Testing, Histocompatibility,Testings, Histocompatibility,Tissue Crossmatching,Tissue Crossmatchings,Tissue Typings,Typing, HLA,Typing, Tissue,Typings, HLA,Typings, Tissue
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000208 Acute Disease Disease having a short and relatively severe course. Acute Diseases,Disease, Acute,Diseases, Acute
D000293 Adolescent A person 13 to 18 years of age. Adolescence,Youth,Adolescents,Adolescents, Female,Adolescents, Male,Teenagers,Teens,Adolescent, Female,Adolescent, Male,Female Adolescent,Female Adolescents,Male Adolescent,Male Adolescents,Teen,Teenager,Youths

Related Publications

A S MacDonald, and
December 2007, Transplantation proceedings,
A S MacDonald, and
April 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery,
Copied contents to your clipboard!