Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures. 2005

David R Paoletti, and Travis E Doom, and Carissa M Krane, and Michael L Raymer, and Dan E Krane
Computer Science Department, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, USA.

Samples containing DNA from two or more individuals can be difficult to interpret. Even ascertaining the number of contributors can be challenging and associated uncertainties can have dramatic effects on the interpretation of testing results. Using an FBI genotypes dataset, containing complete genotype information from the 13 Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) loci for 959 individuals, all possible mixtures of three individuals were exhaustively and empirically computed. Allele sharing between pairs of individuals in the original dataset, a randomized dataset and datasets of generated cousins and siblings was evaluated as were the number of loci that were necessary to reliably deduce the number of contributors present in simulated mixtures of four or less contributors. The relatively small number of alleles detectable at most CODIS loci and the fact that some alleles are likely to be shared between individuals within a population can make the maximum number of different alleles observed at any tested loci an unreliable indicator of the maximum number of contributors to a mixed DNA sample. This analysis does not use other data available from the electropherograms (such as peak height or peak area) to estimate the number of contributors to each mixture. As a result, the study represents a worst case analysis of mixture characterization. Within this dataset, approximately 3% of three-person mixtures would be mischaracterized as two-person mixtures and more than 70% of four-person mixtures would be mischaracterized as two- or three-person mixtures using only the maximum number of alleles observed at any tested locus.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D005828 Genetics, Population The discipline studying genetic composition of populations and effects of factors such as GENETIC SELECTION, population size, MUTATION, migration, and GENETIC DRIFT on the frequencies of various GENOTYPES and PHENOTYPES using a variety of GENETIC TECHNIQUES. Population Genetics
D005838 Genotype The genetic constitution of the individual, comprising the ALLELES present at each GENETIC LOCUS. Genogroup,Genogroups,Genotypes
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000483 Alleles Variant forms of the same gene, occupying the same locus on homologous CHROMOSOMES, and governing the variants in production of the same gene product. Allelomorphs,Allele,Allelomorph
D016172 DNA Fingerprinting A technique for identifying individuals of a species that is based on the uniqueness of their DNA sequence. Uniqueness is determined by identifying which combination of allelic variations occur in the individual at a statistically relevant number of different loci. In forensic studies, RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM of multiple, highly polymorphic VNTR LOCI or MICROSATELLITE REPEAT loci are analyzed. The number of loci used for the profile depends on the ALLELE FREQUENCY in the population. DNA Fingerprints,DNA Profiling,DNA Typing,Genetic Fingerprinting,DNA Fingerprint,DNA Fingerprintings,DNA Profilings,DNA Typings,Fingerprint, DNA,Fingerprinting, DNA,Fingerprinting, Genetic,Fingerprintings, DNA,Fingerprintings, Genetic,Fingerprints, DNA,Genetic Fingerprintings,Profiling, DNA,Typing, DNA,Typings, DNA
D019992 Databases as Topic Works on organized collections of records, standardized in format and content, that are stored in any of a variety of computer-readable modes. Data Banks as Topic,Data Bases as Topic,Databanks as Topic
D020080 Tandem Repeat Sequences Copies of DNA sequences which lie adjacent to each other in the same orientation (direct tandem repeats) or in the opposite direction to each other (INVERTED TANDEM REPEATS). Direct Tandem Repeats,Tandem Repeat,Tandem Repeats,Direct Tandem Repeat,Repeat Sequence, Tandem,Repeat Sequences, Tandem,Repeat, Direct Tandem,Repeat, Tandem,Repeats, Direct Tandem,Repeats, Tandem,Sequence, Tandem Repeat,Sequences, Tandem Repeat,Tandem Repeat Sequence,Tandem Repeat, Direct,Tandem Repeats, Direct

Related Publications

David R Paoletti, and Travis E Doom, and Carissa M Krane, and Michael L Raymer, and Dan E Krane
June 1970, Analytical biochemistry,
David R Paoletti, and Travis E Doom, and Carissa M Krane, and Michael L Raymer, and Dan E Krane
May 2017, Forensic science international. Genetics,
David R Paoletti, and Travis E Doom, and Carissa M Krane, and Michael L Raymer, and Dan E Krane
January 1994, International journal of aging & human development,
David R Paoletti, and Travis E Doom, and Carissa M Krane, and Michael L Raymer, and Dan E Krane
April 1983, Journal of community psychology,
David R Paoletti, and Travis E Doom, and Carissa M Krane, and Michael L Raymer, and Dan E Krane
January 1990, The Behavior analyst,
David R Paoletti, and Travis E Doom, and Carissa M Krane, and Michael L Raymer, and Dan E Krane
March 2001, Psychological bulletin,
David R Paoletti, and Travis E Doom, and Carissa M Krane, and Michael L Raymer, and Dan E Krane
April 2013, Human mutation,
David R Paoletti, and Travis E Doom, and Carissa M Krane, and Michael L Raymer, and Dan E Krane
January 1954, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum,
David R Paoletti, and Travis E Doom, and Carissa M Krane, and Michael L Raymer, and Dan E Krane
April 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology,
David R Paoletti, and Travis E Doom, and Carissa M Krane, and Michael L Raymer, and Dan E Krane
January 1998, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines,
Copied contents to your clipboard!