The influence of reading unit size on the development of Stroop interference in early word decoding. 2008

Paula J Schwanenflugel, and Robin D Morris, and Melanie R Kuhn, and Gregory P Strauss, and Jennifer M Sieczko
P. J. Schwanenflugel . J. M. Sieczko, Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology, University of Georgia, 325 R Aderhold Hall, Athens, GA 30602, USA, email: pschwan@uga.edu.

The purpose of the experiments was to determine the automatic use of large or small word reading units in young readers in the absence of word decoding strategies. Picture-word Stroop interference was examined from four types of conflicting labels: (a) words containing both highly predictable grapheme-phoneme correspondence (GPC) units and highly consistent rime units (henceforth, Hi-GPC + Hi-Rime); (b) words with highly predictable GPC units and less consistent rime units (Hi-GPC + Lo-Rime); (c) words with low predictability GPC units and highly consistent rime units (Low GPC + High Rime); (d) nonwords that contained both highly predictable GPC and highly consistent rime units. Naming time for pictures containing these labels was compared against that for pictures with random letter strings or no labels. In Experiment 1, Stroop interference was examined in first, second, and third grade children to determine whether there was developmental change in the presence of rime or GPC interference. In Experiment 2, Stroop interference was examined as a function of relative reading skill in first grade children. In Experiment 3, Stroop interference in adults was compared to the use of rime or GPC pronunciation strategies for nonword reading. In all experiments, Stroop interference in picture naming was longer for pictures with highly predictable GPC unit labels than less predictable GPC unit labels. However, in Experiment 3, even though adults showed interference from predictable GPC units in the Stroop task, they always preferred rime pronunciation for ambiguous non-words in the nonword reading task. It is argued that the current experiments provide evidence for a flexible units model.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Paula J Schwanenflugel, and Robin D Morris, and Melanie R Kuhn, and Gregory P Strauss, and Jennifer M Sieczko
April 1974, Perceptual and motor skills,
Paula J Schwanenflugel, and Robin D Morris, and Melanie R Kuhn, and Gregory P Strauss, and Jennifer M Sieczko
March 1990, Acta psychologica,
Paula J Schwanenflugel, and Robin D Morris, and Melanie R Kuhn, and Gregory P Strauss, and Jennifer M Sieczko
May 2014, Acta psychologica,
Paula J Schwanenflugel, and Robin D Morris, and Melanie R Kuhn, and Gregory P Strauss, and Jennifer M Sieczko
April 2006, Psychological science,
Paula J Schwanenflugel, and Robin D Morris, and Melanie R Kuhn, and Gregory P Strauss, and Jennifer M Sieczko
January 2022, Kathmandu University medical journal (KUMJ),
Paula J Schwanenflugel, and Robin D Morris, and Melanie R Kuhn, and Gregory P Strauss, and Jennifer M Sieczko
February 2018, Journal of experimental child psychology,
Paula J Schwanenflugel, and Robin D Morris, and Melanie R Kuhn, and Gregory P Strauss, and Jennifer M Sieczko
August 1985, Perceptual and motor skills,
Paula J Schwanenflugel, and Robin D Morris, and Melanie R Kuhn, and Gregory P Strauss, and Jennifer M Sieczko
April 1980, Perceptual and motor skills,
Paula J Schwanenflugel, and Robin D Morris, and Melanie R Kuhn, and Gregory P Strauss, and Jennifer M Sieczko
October 2014, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior,
Paula J Schwanenflugel, and Robin D Morris, and Melanie R Kuhn, and Gregory P Strauss, and Jennifer M Sieczko
January 1993, Experimental aging research,
Copied contents to your clipboard!