Can subjects voluntarily set an internal coordinate frame in such a way as to facilitate the detection of symmetry about an arbitrary axis? If so, is this internal coordinate frame the same as that involved in determining perceived top and bottom in object recognition and shape perception? Subjects were required to determine whether dot patterns were symmetric. Cuing the subjects in advance about the orientation of the axis of symmetry produced a substantial speedup in performance (Experiments 1 and 3) and an increase in accuracy with brief displays (Experiment 2). The effects appeared roughly additive, with an overall advantage for vertical symmetry; thus, the vertical axis effect is not due to a tendency to prepare for the vertical axis. The cuing advantage was found to depend upon the subject's knowing in advance the spatial location as well as orientation of the frame of reference (Experiment 4). The fifth experiment provided evidence that the frame of reference responsible for these effects is the same as the one that determines shape perception: Subjects viewed displays containing a letter (at an unpredictable orientation) and a dot pattern, rapidly naming the letter and then determining whether the dots were symmetric about a prespecified axis. When the top-bottom axis of the letter was oriented the same way as the axis of symmetry for the dots, symmetry judgments were significantly more accurate. Thus, the results suggest a single frame of reference for both types of judgment. The General Discussion proposes a theory of how visual symmetry may be computed, which might account for these phenomena and also characterize their relation to "mental rotation" effects.