The synthesis of bicyclic piperazinone and related derivatives. 1999

Y M Fobian, and K D Moeller
Department of Chemistry, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.

We have been examining synthetic approaches to conformationally restricted peptide building blocks that would allow for the construction of a variety of possible structures in a straight-forward, general way (1). To date, this effort has focused on developing the chemistry needed to rapidly imbed sections of a peptide backbone into a bicyclic or polycyclic ring skeleton (2-4). Such a transformation is accomplished by replacing spacially close hydrogens in a desired conformation with an appropriately sized carbon bridge. The potential advantages of this approach include the preservation of both the peptide backbone and the side chains in the analog, the ability to control the orientation of the side chains relative to each other, the increased hydrolytic stability of the analog, and the ease with which new analogs can be designed. The potential disadvantages of this approach include the difficulty associated with synthesizing the analogs and the steric size of the bridges added. In this chapter, a convenient preparation of analogs having the general structure of I (Fig. 1) is described. Figure 1.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Y M Fobian, and K D Moeller
July 2020, Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin,
Y M Fobian, and K D Moeller
October 2001, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin,
Y M Fobian, and K D Moeller
February 1966, Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin,
Y M Fobian, and K D Moeller
January 1975, Farmatsevtychnyi zhurnal,
Y M Fobian, and K D Moeller
February 2003, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters,
Y M Fobian, and K D Moeller
May 2022, Molecules (Basel, Switzerland),
Y M Fobian, and K D Moeller
August 2001, The Journal of organic chemistry,
Y M Fobian, and K D Moeller
September 2009, Carbohydrate research,
Copied contents to your clipboard!