Exploring the additivity of binaural and monaural masking release. 2011

Joseph W Hall, and Emily Buss, and John H Grose
Department of Otolaryngology∕Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. jwh@med.unc.edu

Experiment 1 examined comodulation masking release (CMR) for a 700-Hz tonal signal under conditions of N(o)S(o) (noise and signal interaurally in phase) and N(o)S(π) (noise in phase, signal out of phase) stimulation. The baseline stimulus for CMR was either a single 24-Hz wide narrowband noise centered on the signal frequency [on-signal band (OSB)] or the OSB plus, a set of flanking noise bands having random envelopes. Masking noise was either gated or continuous. The CMR, defined with respect to either the OSB or the random noise baseline, was smaller for N(o)S(π) than N(o)S(o) stimulation, particularly when the masker was continuous. Experiment 2 examined whether the same pattern of results would be obtained for a 2000-Hz signal frequency; the number of flanking bands was also manipulated (two versus eight). Results again showed smaller CMR for N(o)S(π) than N(o)S(o) stimulation for both continuous and gated masking noise. The CMR was larger with eight than with two flanking bands, and this difference was greater for N(o)S(o) than N(o)S(π). The results of this study are compatible with serial mechanisms of binaural and monaural masking release, but they indicate that the combined masking release (binaural masking-level difference and CMR) falls short of being additive.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009622 Noise Any sound which is unwanted or interferes with HEARING other sounds. Noise Pollution,Noises,Pollution, Noise
D010470 Perceptual Masking The interference of one perceptual stimulus with another causing a decrease or lessening in perceptual effectiveness. Masking, Perceptual,Maskings, Perceptual,Perceptual Maskings
D011571 Psychoacoustics The science pertaining to the interrelationship of psychologic phenomena and the individual's response to the physical properties of sound. Psychoacoustic
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000161 Acoustic Stimulation Use of sound to elicit a response in the nervous system. Auditory Stimulation,Stimulation, Acoustic,Stimulation, Auditory
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D001309 Auditory Threshold The audibility limit of discriminating sound intensity and pitch. Auditory Thresholds,Threshold, Auditory,Thresholds, Auditory

Related Publications

Joseph W Hall, and Emily Buss, and John H Grose
May 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Joseph W Hall, and Emily Buss, and John H Grose
March 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Joseph W Hall, and Emily Buss, and John H Grose
October 2007, Hearing research,
Joseph W Hall, and Emily Buss, and John H Grose
January 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Joseph W Hall, and Emily Buss, and John H Grose
January 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Joseph W Hall, and Emily Buss, and John H Grose
February 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Joseph W Hall, and Emily Buss, and John H Grose
December 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research,
Joseph W Hall, and Emily Buss, and John H Grose
March 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Joseph W Hall, and Emily Buss, and John H Grose
May 1972, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology,
Joseph W Hall, and Emily Buss, and John H Grose
June 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Copied contents to your clipboard!