Comparison of hormone receptor status in primary and recurrent breast cancer. 2012

Hamid Saeedi Saedi, and Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasiri, and Soodabeh ShahidSales, and Ali Taghizadeh, and Nama Mohammadian
Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Research Center, Gilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.

BACKGROUND Systematic treatments such as hormone and chemotherapy are selected according to tumor characteristic after major therapeutic approaches such as surgery. This study attempted to analyze and compare the status of Estrogen Receptor (ER) and Progesterone Receptor (PR) in primary and recurrent sites of breast cancer in patients. METHODS We reviewed all medical records of breast cancer women who were treated between January 1995 and December 2008. One hundred eighty two out of 2241 patients (8.12%) had a metastatic breast cancer. Amongst them 48 patients had tumor and biopsy-driven samples, however 13 samples were destroyed and only 35 samples were investigated in this study, therefore 35 malignant biopsy specimens of breast cancer patients were examined by immunohistochemistry essay for ER and PR. Binominal proportional test and Chi square test were conducted to determine the significant correlation between positive cases of hormone receptors among primary and metastases sites. RESULTS Hormone Receptor in the primary tumor (HR1) of 9 patients (25.7%) was positive (ER1 and/or PR1) and in the recurrent areas (HR2) of 8 patients (22.9%) was positive (either ER2 or PR2 positive). Kappa coefficients of diagnostic agreement in primary and recurrent cases were 0.077 and 0.125 for estrogen and progesterone, respectively which indicated that the amount of coefficient of agreement is not considerable between primary and recurrent sites. CONCLUSIONS The current study indicated that receptor status in recurrent tumors did not pose predictable value based on the analysis of hormone receptors in primary stage, so it is not an appropriate basis to set up therapeutic protocol in the metastatic patients. Therefore, tissue sampling and hormone receptor re-analyzing of metastatic sites should be considered in these cases.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Hamid Saeedi Saedi, and Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasiri, and Soodabeh ShahidSales, and Ali Taghizadeh, and Nama Mohammadian
January 2019, Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland),
Hamid Saeedi Saedi, and Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasiri, and Soodabeh ShahidSales, and Ali Taghizadeh, and Nama Mohammadian
August 2016, Clinical breast cancer,
Hamid Saeedi Saedi, and Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasiri, and Soodabeh ShahidSales, and Ali Taghizadeh, and Nama Mohammadian
September 1985, Seminars in oncology,
Hamid Saeedi Saedi, and Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasiri, and Soodabeh ShahidSales, and Ali Taghizadeh, and Nama Mohammadian
August 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute,
Hamid Saeedi Saedi, and Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasiri, and Soodabeh ShahidSales, and Ali Taghizadeh, and Nama Mohammadian
June 2002, European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990),
Hamid Saeedi Saedi, and Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasiri, and Soodabeh ShahidSales, and Ali Taghizadeh, and Nama Mohammadian
October 2015, Clinical breast cancer,
Hamid Saeedi Saedi, and Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasiri, and Soodabeh ShahidSales, and Ali Taghizadeh, and Nama Mohammadian
January 1987, Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie,
Hamid Saeedi Saedi, and Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasiri, and Soodabeh ShahidSales, and Ali Taghizadeh, and Nama Mohammadian
December 2007, Pathology international,
Hamid Saeedi Saedi, and Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasiri, and Soodabeh ShahidSales, and Ali Taghizadeh, and Nama Mohammadian
June 2012, Cancer causes & control : CCC,
Hamid Saeedi Saedi, and Mohammad-Reza Ghavam Nasiri, and Soodabeh ShahidSales, and Ali Taghizadeh, and Nama Mohammadian
January 2016, Clinical epigenetics,
Copied contents to your clipboard!