Interfacial bond strengths between layers of visible light-activated composites. 1988

A H Tjan, and J F Glancy
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Loma Linda University, School of Dentistry, Calif.

The bond strengths between composite layers either cured to themselves or to other types (classes) of composites of similar or different brands were measured by using a direct tensile test (true tension). The diametral compression test for tension for each material tested was also conducted according to ADA specification No. 27. The values were used for comparison. 1. The interfacial bond strengths were generally found to be higher than the cohesive strengths of the weaker materials when cured to different types of composites or of the weak region in the specimen when composites were cured to themselves. 2. The cohesive tensile failure of the materials occurred at much lower stress levels than their corresponding diametral tensile strength (ranging from 1/4 to 1/3 of the diametral strength). 3. When two types of composites were bonded together the cohesive failure occurred consistently within the materials with lower diametral strength. Correlation was observed between the values of cohesive strength of material measured with true tension and the diametral test. 4. A urethane dimethacrylate microfilled composite bonded weakly to BIS-GMA composite, therefore, their combined use should be avoided. 5. Incremental placement produced a clinically acceptable bond strength because it exceeded or was at least comparable to the cohesive strength of the material.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008027 Light That portion of the electromagnetic spectrum in the visible, ultraviolet, and infrared range. Light, Visible,Photoradiation,Radiation, Visible,Visible Radiation,Photoradiations,Radiations, Visible,Visible Light,Visible Radiations
D008422 Materials Testing The testing of materials and devices, especially those used for PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SUTURES; TISSUE ADHESIVES; etc., for hardness, strength, durability, safety, efficacy, and biocompatibility. Biocompatibility Testing,Biocompatible Materials Testing,Hemocompatibility Testing,Testing, Biocompatible Materials,Testing, Hemocompatible Materials,Hemocompatibility Testings,Hemocompatible Materials Testing,Materials Testing, Biocompatible,Materials Testing, Hemocompatible,Testing, Biocompatibility,Testing, Hemocompatibility,Testing, Materials,Testings, Biocompatibility
D001840 Dental Bonding An adhesion procedure for orthodontic attachments, such as plastic DENTAL CROWNS. This process usually includes the application of an adhesive material (DENTAL CEMENTS) and letting it harden in-place by light or chemical curing. Bonding, Dental,Cure of Orthodontic Adhesives,Curing, Dental Cement,Dental Cement Curing,Orthodontic Adhesives Cure
D003188 Composite Resins Synthetic resins, containing an inert filler, that are widely used in dentistry. Composite Resin,Resin, Composite,Resins, Composite
D013718 Tensile Strength The maximum stress a material subjected to a stretching load can withstand without tearing. (McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 5th ed, p2001) Strength, Tensile,Strengths, Tensile,Tensile Strengths

Related Publications

A H Tjan, and J F Glancy
August 1986, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
A H Tjan, and J F Glancy
February 1984, Acta odontologica Scandinavica,
A H Tjan, and J F Glancy
November 2009, The journal of contemporary dental practice,
A H Tjan, and J F Glancy
November 1986, Tohoku Shika Daigaku Gakkai shi,
A H Tjan, and J F Glancy
September 1985, International dental journal,
A H Tjan, and J F Glancy
June 1998, American journal of dentistry,
A H Tjan, and J F Glancy
August 1990, Odontostomatologike proodos,
A H Tjan, and J F Glancy
March 1987, Tohoku Shika Daigaku Gakkai shi,
A H Tjan, and J F Glancy
January 1991, The International journal of prosthodontics,
Copied contents to your clipboard!