Detectability of tonal signals with changing interaural phase differences in noise. 1988

D W Grantham, and L E Luethke
Bill Wilkerson Hearing & Speech Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37212.

Detectability of binaurally presented 400- and 800-Hz tonal signals was investigated in an adaptive, two-interval forced-choice experiment. A continuous 3150-Hz low-pass noise masker was presented either diotically (No), interaurally uncorrelated (NU), or interaurally phase-reversed (N pi), at an overall level of 70 dB SPL. Signal duration was either 100 or 1000 ms. The interaural phase difference (IAPD) of the signal was either fixed (0 degree-180 degrees) or time-varying (slightly different frequencies were presented to the two ears). The range of interaural phase variations was selected to yield the same varying interaural temporal differences that would be produced if real auditory targets moved through various arcs in the horizontal plane. In no case was a signal with varying IAPD any more (or less) detectable than would be expected from averaging subjects' performance in the corresponding fixed-IAPD conditions through which the variation occurred. However, in detecting these signals, subjects placed relatively more weight on the temporal central portion than on either the onset or offset. It is proposed that this weighting effect is based on two factors: (1) the signal's 20-ms rise-decay time (i.e., the onset and offset receive less binaural weight because of monaural attenuation); and (2) the very low-pass filtering effected by the binaural system, which results in some minimum time required for it to become "fully engaged." Another finding was that signal detectability became gradually worse as the antiphasic moment in a varying-IAPD signal was moved from the temporal midpoint toward the onset. No evidence was found that a signal's onset and offset were weighted differently in a binaural signal detection task.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D009622 Noise Any sound which is unwanted or interferes with HEARING other sounds. Noise Pollution,Noises,Pollution, Noise
D010470 Perceptual Masking The interference of one perceptual stimulus with another causing a decrease or lessening in perceptual effectiveness. Masking, Perceptual,Maskings, Perceptual,Perceptual Maskings
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000161 Acoustic Stimulation Use of sound to elicit a response in the nervous system. Auditory Stimulation,Stimulation, Acoustic,Stimulation, Auditory
D001307 Auditory Perception The process whereby auditory stimuli are selected, organized, and interpreted by the organism. Auditory Processing,Perception, Auditory,Processing, Auditory
D001309 Auditory Threshold The audibility limit of discriminating sound intensity and pitch. Auditory Thresholds,Threshold, Auditory,Thresholds, Auditory

Related Publications

D W Grantham, and L E Luethke
April 1980, Fiziologicheskii zhurnal SSSR imeni I. M. Sechenova,
D W Grantham, and L E Luethke
February 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
D W Grantham, and L E Luethke
October 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
D W Grantham, and L E Luethke
August 1974, Human factors,
D W Grantham, and L E Luethke
November 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
D W Grantham, and L E Luethke
February 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
D W Grantham, and L E Luethke
June 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
D W Grantham, and L E Luethke
September 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision,
Copied contents to your clipboard!