Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Esomeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate Immediate-Release Capsules in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: A Cross-Over, Randomized Controlled Trial. 2021

Shan Jing, and Yue Zhu, and Wenfang Liu, and Kexu Yang, and Lili Hu, and Dan Deng, and Chunyan Lu, and Yang Lin
Clinical Pharmacology Centre, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Esomeprazole delayed release tablets (ESO) are one of the most effective treatments for acid-related disorders. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of an immediate-release capsule formulation containing esomeprazole 20 mg and sodium bicarbonate 1100 mg (IR-ESO) compared to those of the esomeprazole delayed release tablet 20 mg (ESO). In addition, the impact of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on PK and PD was evaluated. A single-center, open-label, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, and 2-period crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy Chinese subjects. Subjects received either IR-ESO or ESO for 5 days. After single- and multiple-dosing administration, blood samples were collected for PK analysis, and intragastric pH was assessed by 24-h pH monitoring. The CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) [GMR (95%CI)] of IR-ESO/ESO for AUCinf [single dose: 103.60% (96.58%, 111.14%), multiple doses: 101.65% (97.88%, 105.57%)] were within the range of 80.00-125.00%. The AUCinf showed an increasing trend between CYP2C19 extensive metabolizer (EM), intermediate metabolizer (IM), and poor metabolizer (PM) after single-dose and multiple-dose administration (p < 0.05). The GMR (95%CI) of IR-ESO/ESO for 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline [single dose: 101.07% (96.56%, 105.78%), multiple doses: 101.24% (97.74%, 104.86%)] were within the range of 80.00-125.00%. The percentage changes in 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline was significant difference between EM, IM, and PM after single-dose IR-ESO and ESO (p < 0.05). Drugs were all well tolerated, and there were no significant differences in adverse events between IR-ESO and ESO. This study showed that IR-ESO can inhibit the secretion of gastric acid rapidly and continuously, and that the PK and PD of IR-ESO are affected by CYP2C19 genotypes. The GMR (95% CI) of IR-ESO/ESO for AUCinf and the percentage changes in 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline were all within the range of 80.00-125.00%. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900024935.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D002214 Capsules Hard or soft soluble containers used for the oral administration of medicine. Capsule,Microcapsule,Microcapsules
D002681 China A country spanning from central Asia to the Pacific Ocean. Inner Mongolia,Manchuria,People's Republic of China,Sinkiang,Mainland China
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D001639 Bicarbonates Inorganic salts that contain the -HCO3 radical. They are an important factor in determining the pH of the blood and the concentration of bicarbonate ions is regulated by the kidney. Levels in the blood are an index of the alkali reserve or buffering capacity. Bicarbonate,Bicarbonate Ions,Hydrogen Carbonates,Bicarbonate Ion,Carbonic Acid Ions,Hydrogen Carbonate,Carbonate, Hydrogen,Carbonates, Hydrogen,Ion, Bicarbonate,Ions, Bicarbonate,Ions, Carbonic Acid
D017693 Sodium Bicarbonate A white, crystalline powder that is commonly used as a pH buffering agent, an electrolyte replenisher, systemic alkalizer and in topical cleansing solutions. Baking Soda,Carbonic Acid Monosodium Salt,Sodium Hydrogen Carbonate,Bicarbonate, Sodium,Hydrogen Carbonate, Sodium,Soda, Baking
D054328 Proton Pump Inhibitors Compounds that inhibit H(+)-K(+)-EXCHANGING ATPASE. They are used as ANTI-ULCER AGENTS and sometimes in place of HISTAMINE H2 ANTAGONISTS for GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX. Proton Pump Inhibitor,Inhibitor, Proton Pump,Inhibitors, Proton Pump,Pump Inhibitor, Proton
D018592 Cross-Over Studies Studies comparing two or more treatments or interventions in which the subjects or patients, upon completion of the course of one treatment, are switched to another. In the case of two treatments, A and B, half the subjects are randomly allocated to receive these in the order A, B and half to receive them in the order B, A. A criticism of this design is that effects of the first treatment may carry over into the period when the second is given. (Last, A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Cross-Over Design,Cross-Over Trials,Crossover Design,Crossover Studies,Crossover Trials,Cross Over Design,Cross Over Studies,Cross Over Trials,Cross-Over Designs,Cross-Over Study,Crossover Designs,Crossover Study,Design, Cross-Over,Design, Crossover,Designs, Cross-Over,Designs, Crossover,Studies, Cross-Over,Studies, Crossover,Study, Cross-Over,Study, Crossover,Trial, Cross-Over,Trial, Crossover,Trials, Cross-Over,Trials, Crossover
D064098 Esomeprazole The S-isomer of omeprazole. Esomeprazole Magnesium,Esomeprazole Potassium,Esomeprazole Sodium,Esomeprazole Strontium,Esomeprazole Strontium Anhydrous,Nexium,Strontium, Esomeprazole
D064368 Healthy Volunteers Persons with no known significant health problems who are recruited to participate in research to test a new drug, device, or intervention as controls for a patient group. (from http://clinicalcenter.nih.gov/recruit/volunteers.html, accessed 2/14/2013) Healthy Participants,Healthy Subjects,Human Volunteers,Normal Volunteers,Healthy Participant,Healthy Subject,Healthy Volunteer,Human Volunteer,Normal Volunteer,Participant, Healthy,Participants, Healthy,Subject, Healthy,Subjects, Healthy,Volunteer, Healthy,Volunteer, Human,Volunteer, Normal,Volunteers, Human,Volunteers, Normal

Related Publications

Shan Jing, and Yue Zhu, and Wenfang Liu, and Kexu Yang, and Lili Hu, and Dan Deng, and Chunyan Lu, and Yang Lin
September 2023, Clinical pharmacology in drug development,
Shan Jing, and Yue Zhu, and Wenfang Liu, and Kexu Yang, and Lili Hu, and Dan Deng, and Chunyan Lu, and Yang Lin
January 2019, Drug design, development and therapy,
Shan Jing, and Yue Zhu, and Wenfang Liu, and Kexu Yang, and Lili Hu, and Dan Deng, and Chunyan Lu, and Yang Lin
June 2016, Pharmacology research & perspectives,
Shan Jing, and Yue Zhu, and Wenfang Liu, and Kexu Yang, and Lili Hu, and Dan Deng, and Chunyan Lu, and Yang Lin
December 2013, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology,
Shan Jing, and Yue Zhu, and Wenfang Liu, and Kexu Yang, and Lili Hu, and Dan Deng, and Chunyan Lu, and Yang Lin
January 2009, Journal of clinical pharmacology,
Shan Jing, and Yue Zhu, and Wenfang Liu, and Kexu Yang, and Lili Hu, and Dan Deng, and Chunyan Lu, and Yang Lin
January 2023, Scientific reports,
Shan Jing, and Yue Zhu, and Wenfang Liu, and Kexu Yang, and Lili Hu, and Dan Deng, and Chunyan Lu, and Yang Lin
January 2018, PloS one,
Shan Jing, and Yue Zhu, and Wenfang Liu, and Kexu Yang, and Lili Hu, and Dan Deng, and Chunyan Lu, and Yang Lin
November 2005, Journal of clinical pharmacology,
Shan Jing, and Yue Zhu, and Wenfang Liu, and Kexu Yang, and Lili Hu, and Dan Deng, and Chunyan Lu, and Yang Lin
April 1990, International clinical psychopharmacology,
Shan Jing, and Yue Zhu, and Wenfang Liu, and Kexu Yang, and Lili Hu, and Dan Deng, and Chunyan Lu, and Yang Lin
July 2023, Clinical pharmacology in drug development,
Copied contents to your clipboard!