Trivers and Willard proposed that female mammals should adjust their investment in male versus female offspring relative to their ability to produce high-quality offspring. We tested whether litter size-sex ratio trade-offs predicted by Adaptive Sex Allocation (ASA) theory occur among Richardson's ground squirrel (Urocitellus richardsonii) dams over 10 distinct breeding years in a population where individuals experienced variability in food availability and habitat disruption. Litters of primiparous dams became increasingly female-biased with increasing litter size, but that trend waned among second litters born to dams, and reversed among third litters, with larger litters becoming more male-biased, suggesting that ASA is a product of interacting selection pressures. Trade-offs were not associated with habitat disruption, the availability of supplementary food, or dam age. An association between habitat disruption and male-biased sex ratios, the prevalence of litter size-sex ratio trade-offs and placental scar counts exceeding the number of juveniles at weaning in our population, but not in a geographically distinct population of conspecifics exposed to different environmental conditions reveal that the expression of ASA varies among populations and among years within populations, illustrating the conditional nature of ASA.