The reliability of radiation dose display of a computed tomography scanner. 2021

V Forss, and H Yli-Ollila, and J Vatanen, and P Kölhi, and V-P Poutanen, and A Palomäki
Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland.

BACKGROUND Internationally, the typical allowed difference between the measured radiation dose and dose reported by a computed tomography (CT) scanner is ±20 %. The objective is to describe a method in order to analyse this difference in a CT scanner in the Emergency Department of Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, and to calculate a correction factor for more comparable radiation dose values in further studies. METHODS Ten intra-day radiation dose measurements were performed with undisturbed setting. Measurement reports on differences between measured and displayed dose were gathered from the vendor maintenance and supervising authority over a 12-year period. Additionally, two in-house measurements were made. A total of 18 datapoints were collected, with some differences in measurement settings. Data were also analysed against imaging parameters, ambient air pressure and time to identify trends or associations in the variation of the discrepancy. RESULTS Measured doses were generally lower than displayed doses. Differences between displayed and measured doses varied between -3.46 and -0.10 %, with a mean of -1.26 % in the intra-day measurements, and between +4.65 and -17.3 %, with a mean of -7.53 % in the long-term data. There were no trends nor connections in the variations. CONCLUSIONS Since the acceptable difference between the radiation dose display and the measured dose is relevant, the average difference for every CT scanner should be determined before radiation dose studies, especially when comparing multiple scanners.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

V Forss, and H Yli-Ollila, and J Vatanen, and P Kölhi, and V-P Poutanen, and A Palomäki
January 2018, Journal of medical physics,
V Forss, and H Yli-Ollila, and J Vatanen, and P Kölhi, and V-P Poutanen, and A Palomäki
July 2015, European radiology,
V Forss, and H Yli-Ollila, and J Vatanen, and P Kölhi, and V-P Poutanen, and A Palomäki
January 2022, Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society,
V Forss, and H Yli-Ollila, and J Vatanen, and P Kölhi, and V-P Poutanen, and A Palomäki
January 2011, American journal of otolaryngology,
V Forss, and H Yli-Ollila, and J Vatanen, and P Kölhi, and V-P Poutanen, and A Palomäki
January 1999, Radiologic technology,
V Forss, and H Yli-Ollila, and J Vatanen, and P Kölhi, and V-P Poutanen, and A Palomäki
January 2010, Radiologic technology,
V Forss, and H Yli-Ollila, and J Vatanen, and P Kölhi, and V-P Poutanen, and A Palomäki
June 2010, European journal of radiology,
V Forss, and H Yli-Ollila, and J Vatanen, and P Kölhi, and V-P Poutanen, and A Palomäki
January 2010, Medical physics,
V Forss, and H Yli-Ollila, and J Vatanen, and P Kölhi, and V-P Poutanen, and A Palomäki
July 2015, Radiation protection dosimetry,
V Forss, and H Yli-Ollila, and J Vatanen, and P Kölhi, and V-P Poutanen, and A Palomäki
April 2018, Anaesthesia,
Copied contents to your clipboard!