Individualized Wound Closure-Mechanical Properties of Suture Materials. 2022

Elias Polykandriotis, and Jonas Daenicke, and Anil Bolat, and Jasmin Grüner, and Dirk W Schubert, and Raymund E Horch
Department of Plastic, Hand and Microsurgery, Sana Hospital Hof, 95032 Hof, Germany.

Wound closure is a key element of any procedure, especially aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery. Therefore, over the last decades, several devices have been developed in order to assist surgeons in achieving better results while saving valuable time. In this work, we give a concise review of the literature and present a biomechanical study of different suturing materials under mechanical load mimicking handling in the operating theatre. Nine different suture products, all of the same USP size (4-0), were subjected to a standardized crushing load by means of a needle holder. All materials were subjected to 0, 1, 3 and 5 crushing load cycles, respectively. The linear tensile strength was measured by means of a universal testing device. Attenuation of tensile strength was evaluated between materials and between crush cycles. In the pooled analysis, the linear tensile strength of the suture materials deteriorated significantly with every cycle (p < 0.0001). The suture materials displayed different initial tensile strengths (in descending order: polyglecaprone, polyglactin, polydioxanone, polyamid, polypropylene). In comparison, materials performed variably in terms of resistance to crush loading. The findings were statistically significant. The reconstructive surgeon has to be flexible and tailor wound closure techniques and materials to the individual patient, procedure and tissue demands; therefore, profound knowledge of the physical properties of the suture strands used is of paramount importance. The crushing load on suture materials during surgery can be detrimental for initial and long-term wound repair strength. As well as the standard wound closure methods (sutures, staples and adhesive strips), there are promising novel devices.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Elias Polykandriotis, and Jonas Daenicke, and Anil Bolat, and Jasmin Grüner, and Dirk W Schubert, and Raymund E Horch
January 1983, European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes,
Elias Polykandriotis, and Jonas Daenicke, and Anil Bolat, and Jasmin Grüner, and Dirk W Schubert, and Raymund E Horch
March 1981, Annals of surgery,
Elias Polykandriotis, and Jonas Daenicke, and Anil Bolat, and Jasmin Grüner, and Dirk W Schubert, and Raymund E Horch
May 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology,
Elias Polykandriotis, and Jonas Daenicke, and Anil Bolat, and Jasmin Grüner, and Dirk W Schubert, and Raymund E Horch
January 2020, World journal of surgery,
Elias Polykandriotis, and Jonas Daenicke, and Anil Bolat, and Jasmin Grüner, and Dirk W Schubert, and Raymund E Horch
February 2002, Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America,
Elias Polykandriotis, and Jonas Daenicke, and Anil Bolat, and Jasmin Grüner, and Dirk W Schubert, and Raymund E Horch
June 1987, Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology,
Elias Polykandriotis, and Jonas Daenicke, and Anil Bolat, and Jasmin Grüner, and Dirk W Schubert, and Raymund E Horch
December 2022, Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013),
Elias Polykandriotis, and Jonas Daenicke, and Anil Bolat, and Jasmin Grüner, and Dirk W Schubert, and Raymund E Horch
May 2015, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials,
Elias Polykandriotis, and Jonas Daenicke, and Anil Bolat, and Jasmin Grüner, and Dirk W Schubert, and Raymund E Horch
May 2000, Der Unfallchirurg,
Elias Polykandriotis, and Jonas Daenicke, and Anil Bolat, and Jasmin Grüner, and Dirk W Schubert, and Raymund E Horch
August 1981, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,
Copied contents to your clipboard!