Fracture Resistance of Posterior Tooth-Supported Cantilever Fixed Dental Prostheses of Different Zirconia Generations and Framework Thicknesses: An In Vitro Study. 2024

Anna-Luisa Klotz, and Janina Halfmann, and Stefan Rues, and Wolfgang Bömicke, and Peter Rammelsberg, and Andreas Zenthöfer
Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

The rehabilitation of free-end situations is a frequent indication in prosthetic dentistry. Cantilever fixed dental prostheses (cFDPs) made of 1st and 2nd generation zirconia are one treatment option. Due to a unique gradient technology, combinations of different zirconium dioxide generations are thus feasible in one restoration. However, data about these materials are rare. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate the fracture resistance and fracture modes of tooth-supported cFDPs fabricated from different zirconia materials (gradient technology) and different framework thicknesses. A total of 40 cFDPs were fabricated using the CAD/CAM approach and belonged to five test groups. The different groups differed in the yttria content, the proportion of the tetragonal/cubic phases, or in wall thickness (0.7 mm or 1 mm). After completion, the cFDPs were subjected to thermal cycling and chewing simulation (1.2 × 106 load cycles, 108 N load). Afterwards, cFDPs were statically loaded until fracture in a universal testing machine. A non-parametric ANOVA was compiled to determine the possible effects of group membership on fracture resistance. In addition, post-hoc Tukey tests were used for bivariate comparisons. The mean fracture loads under axial load application ranged from 288 to 577 N. ANOVA detected a significant impact of the used material on the fracture resistances (p < 0.001). Therefore, the use of cFDPs fabricated by gradient technology zirconia may not be unreservedly recommended for clinical use, whereas cFPDs made from 3Y-TZP exhibit fracture resistance above possible masticatory loads in the posterior region.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Anna-Luisa Klotz, and Janina Halfmann, and Stefan Rues, and Wolfgang Bömicke, and Peter Rammelsberg, and Andreas Zenthöfer
April 2022, Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985),
Anna-Luisa Klotz, and Janina Halfmann, and Stefan Rues, and Wolfgang Bömicke, and Peter Rammelsberg, and Andreas Zenthöfer
August 2008, Acta odontologica Scandinavica,
Anna-Luisa Klotz, and Janina Halfmann, and Stefan Rues, and Wolfgang Bömicke, and Peter Rammelsberg, and Andreas Zenthöfer
April 2012, The journal of adhesive dentistry,
Anna-Luisa Klotz, and Janina Halfmann, and Stefan Rues, and Wolfgang Bömicke, and Peter Rammelsberg, and Andreas Zenthöfer
April 2021, Molecules (Basel, Switzerland),
Anna-Luisa Klotz, and Janina Halfmann, and Stefan Rues, and Wolfgang Bömicke, and Peter Rammelsberg, and Andreas Zenthöfer
May 2022, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials,
Anna-Luisa Klotz, and Janina Halfmann, and Stefan Rues, and Wolfgang Bömicke, and Peter Rammelsberg, and Andreas Zenthöfer
January 2022, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants,
Anna-Luisa Klotz, and Janina Halfmann, and Stefan Rues, and Wolfgang Bömicke, and Peter Rammelsberg, and Andreas Zenthöfer
August 2011, Implant dentistry,
Anna-Luisa Klotz, and Janina Halfmann, and Stefan Rues, and Wolfgang Bömicke, and Peter Rammelsberg, and Andreas Zenthöfer
May 2022, Materials (Basel, Switzerland),
Anna-Luisa Klotz, and Janina Halfmann, and Stefan Rues, and Wolfgang Bömicke, and Peter Rammelsberg, and Andreas Zenthöfer
January 2022, Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry,
Anna-Luisa Klotz, and Janina Halfmann, and Stefan Rues, and Wolfgang Bömicke, and Peter Rammelsberg, and Andreas Zenthöfer
October 2016, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists,
Copied contents to your clipboard!