Effect of sperm swim - up vs density gradient centrifugation on embryo aneuploidy detected by non-invasive chromosomal screening in conventional IVF. 2025

Yanghua Fu, and Jianying Huang, and Jie Wu, and Lin Qiu, and Wen Ou, and Ximeng Ai, and Junzhao Zhao, and Haitao Xi
Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the aneuploidy rates of blastocysts obtained via conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) using sperm prepared by the swim-up (SU) and density gradient centrifugation (DGC) methods, as detected by non-invasive chromosomal screening (NICS). This comparison would provide more evidence for selecting the appropriate semen processing technique for patients undergoing conventional IVF with NICS. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent conventional IVF and NICS at our hospital from January 2022 to May 2024.Patients were grouped by semen - processing method (SU and DGC groups). Semen parameters before and after processing on oocyte - retrieval day, oocyte numbers (retrieved, MII), and 2PN embryos were compared. Fertilization, cleavage, D3 high - quality embryo, embryo ploidy, and aneuploidy rates between the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in multiple indicators such as the number of retrieved oocytes between the two groups (P > 0.05); the rate of high-quality embryos on Day 3 in the DGC group was significantly higher than that in the SU group (53.9 % vs. 48.20 %, P = 0.011).The proportion of embryos with Grade A in the DGC group was 31.8 % (262/824), while that in the SU group was 39.4 % (119/302), showing a statistical difference (P = 0.017). The euploidy rate in the DGC group was 21.7 % (179/824) and the aneuploidy rate was 71.2 % (587/824), while the euploidy rate in the SU group was 25.8 % (78/302) and the aneuploidy rate was 68.9 % (208/302). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The SU method yielded a higher proportion of Grade A embryos but did not reduce aneuploidy rates, suggesting its potential as a simpler, cost-effective alternative to DGC for NICS in conventional IVF.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Yanghua Fu, and Jianying Huang, and Jie Wu, and Lin Qiu, and Wen Ou, and Ximeng Ai, and Junzhao Zhao, and Haitao Xi
December 2017, Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine,
Yanghua Fu, and Jianying Huang, and Jie Wu, and Lin Qiu, and Wen Ou, and Ximeng Ai, and Junzhao Zhao, and Haitao Xi
February 2020, Scientific reports,
Yanghua Fu, and Jianying Huang, and Jie Wu, and Lin Qiu, and Wen Ou, and Ximeng Ai, and Junzhao Zhao, and Haitao Xi
May 2019, Scientific reports,
Yanghua Fu, and Jianying Huang, and Jie Wu, and Lin Qiu, and Wen Ou, and Ximeng Ai, and Junzhao Zhao, and Haitao Xi
April 1991, Human reproduction (Oxford, England),
Yanghua Fu, and Jianying Huang, and Jie Wu, and Lin Qiu, and Wen Ou, and Ximeng Ai, and Junzhao Zhao, and Haitao Xi
February 2009, Fertility and sterility,
Yanghua Fu, and Jianying Huang, and Jie Wu, and Lin Qiu, and Wen Ou, and Ximeng Ai, and Junzhao Zhao, and Haitao Xi
October 2021, The world journal of men's health,
Yanghua Fu, and Jianying Huang, and Jie Wu, and Lin Qiu, and Wen Ou, and Ximeng Ai, and Junzhao Zhao, and Haitao Xi
March 2022, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E,
Yanghua Fu, and Jianying Huang, and Jie Wu, and Lin Qiu, and Wen Ou, and Ximeng Ai, and Junzhao Zhao, and Haitao Xi
January 2024, Reproductive medicine and biology,
Yanghua Fu, and Jianying Huang, and Jie Wu, and Lin Qiu, and Wen Ou, and Ximeng Ai, and Junzhao Zhao, and Haitao Xi
December 2016, Scientific reports,
Yanghua Fu, and Jianying Huang, and Jie Wu, and Lin Qiu, and Wen Ou, and Ximeng Ai, and Junzhao Zhao, and Haitao Xi
October 2014, Animal reproduction science,
Copied contents to your clipboard!