Efficacies of Gram Negative Broth (GN) and Rappaport's Enrichment Broth (RE) were compared for detection of enteric pathogens from clinical specimens. Whereas direct streaking on four plating media found 57% of the salmonellae, GN found 80% and RE found 92% of the 157 isolates. By contrast, direct streaking found 87% of the shigellae whereas GN detected 93%, but RE found only 20%. RE produced 35% more Salmonella-positive plates than GN did, which resulted in a 15% increase in isolates. Statistically, RE proved to be significantly better than GN. The unsuitability of RE for shigellae, however, dictates that, if only one enrichment broth is to be used, GN must be that choice, but that maximal isolations of all enteric pathogens should result from the use of both RE and GN. Of the four plating media, Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate Agar detected 90% of the salmonellae and 85% of the shigellae. Salmonella-Shigella Agar detected 72 and 43%, respectively, and Levine Eosin Methylene Blue Agar found 45 and 55%. Bismuth Sulfite Agar detected only 22% of the salmonellae and found no shigellae. The performance of all of the plating media was enhanced by enrichment, but RE was especially effective for salmonellae when compared to GN.