Thirty-six patients with prior myocardial infarction, and 14 patients without, had myocardial imaging at rest using both seven-pinhole emission tomography and planar imaging with thallium-201. The sensitivity and specificity of the two approaches for the detection of prior myocardial infarction were compared. Qualitatively, planar imaging yielded sensitivities of 69% (25 of 36) and 80% (29 of 36) with Polaroid and video display formats, respectively. A semiquantitative analysis gave a sensitivity of 75% (27 of 36). Specificities for these three planar approaches were, respectively, 100% (14 of 14), 93% (13 of 14), and 71% (10 of 14) for the Polaroid, video, and semiquantitative analyses. Seven-pinhole tomography had a sensitivity of 83% (30 of 36) by qualitative or visual inspection and 86% (31 of 36) by semiquantitative analysis. Specificities by these two techniques were 71% (10 of 14) and 57% (8 of 14). There were no statistically significant differences in either sensitivity or specificity between the planar and tomographic approaches. Repeat seven-pinhole images were identical in 95% (46 of 48) of patients, showing that reproducibility was satisfactory. We conclude that the seven-pinhole tomographic approach has no advantage over standard planar imaging in the detection of prior myocardial infarction.