An automated gap detection tactility test was investigated for quantifying sensory deficits associated with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The test, which involved sensing a tiny gap in an otherwise smooth surface by probing with the finger, had functional resemblance to many work-related tactile activities such as detecting scratches or surface defects. Gap detection thresholds were measured using the converging staircase method of limits paradigm. Sixteen normal subjects between 21 and 66 years of age were tested for studying important factors affecting gap detection thresholds. Actively probing with the index finger had a threshold almost an order of magnitude more sensitive (mean = 0.19 mm, SD = 0.11 mm) than passive touch (mean = 1.63 mm, SD = 0.62 mm), which was similar to two-point discrimination. Average thresholds decreased by 24% as contact force increased from 25 to 75 g. Performance in this tactility test quickly stabilized and showed little learning effects over the period of the test, as evidenced by the lack of significant differences between six replicates. The results were highly repeatable. No significant threshold differences were observed between test and retest trials on different days, or between dominant and non-dominant hands. A contact force of 50 g was recommended as optimal for this test since it required moderate force but resulted in a smaller threshold compared with 25 or 75 g. A companion study was conducted using eight normal subjects and ten subjects diagnosed as having CTS. Average gap detection threshold, when finger probing was allowed, was 0.20 mm (SD = 0.11 min) for the normal subjects and increased two-fold to 0.40 mm (SD = 0.19 mm) for the CTS subjects. Average gap detection threshold, when the finger probing was not allowed, was 1.71 mm (SD = 0.53 mm) for the normal subjects and increased by 48% to 2.53 mm (SD = 0.87 mm) for the CTS subjects. The results suggest that people suffering from CTS may experience similar functional deficits in daily living and work activities. The small inter-subject variability makes this test a candidate for having utility as a monitoring test for loss of cutaneous tactile sensitivity.