In vivo quantification of corneal endothelium function. 1996

J S Saini, and S Mittal
Department of Ophthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Reliable and valid quantification of functional status of the corneal endothelium is a desirable input to optimize monitoring and intervention strategies in clinical disorders affecting endothelium. We examined the validity and clinical usefulness of an in vivo corneal stress test in an age and sex matched sample of 15 eyes each of normal controls, pseudophakic corneal edema and Fuchs' dystrophy. The test measures Percentage Recovery Per Hour (PRPH) as endothelial function by evaluating the deswelling response of cornea. In pseudophakic corneal edema assessed PRPH is significantly lower than in normal cornea (p < 0.01). At optimum critical cut off PRPH of 47.5%, the test has high specificity and sensitivity (93.3%) in pseudophakic corneal edema eyes, which validates the test. When baseline corneal thickness is more than 0.55 mm, PRPH is determined to be below the cut-off value in 100% of eyes. In eyes where baseline corneal thickness is less than 0.55 mm, PRPH ranges from 26.7% to 76.8%. We conclude that the in vivo corneal stress test quantifies endothelial function reliably and when compared to age specific normal eyes, it helps in identifying and monitoring low endothelial function.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009885 Ophthalmology A surgical specialty concerned with the structure and function of the eye and the medical and surgical treatment of its defects and diseases. Ocular Surgery,Ocular Surgeries,Surgery, Ocular
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D004728 Endothelium, Corneal Single layer of large flattened cells covering the surface of the cornea. Anterior Chamber Epithelium,Corneal Endothelium,Endothelium, Anterior Chamber,Epithelium, Anterior Chamber,Anterior Chamber Endothelium
D005260 Female Females
D005642 Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy Disorder caused by loss of endothelium of the central cornea. It is characterized by hyaline endothelial outgrowths on Descemet's membrane, epithelial blisters, reduced vision, and pain. Fuch's Endothelial Dystrophy,Fuchs Atrophy,Fuchs Corneal Dystrophy,Fuchs Dystrophy,Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy,Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy,Dystrophy, Fuch's Endothelial,Dystrophy, Fuchs' Endothelial,Endothelial Dystrophy, Fuch's,Endothelial Dystrophy, Fuchs',Fuch Endothelial Dystrophy
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity
D015203 Reproducibility of Results The statistical reproducibility of measurements (often in a clinical context), including the testing of instrumentation or techniques to obtain reproducible results. The concept includes reproducibility of physiological measurements, which may be used to develop rules to assess probability or prognosis, or response to a stimulus; reproducibility of occurrence of a condition; and reproducibility of experimental results. Reliability and Validity,Reliability of Result,Reproducibility Of Result,Reproducibility of Finding,Validity of Result,Validity of Results,Face Validity,Reliability (Epidemiology),Reliability of Results,Reproducibility of Findings,Test-Retest Reliability,Validity (Epidemiology),Finding Reproducibilities,Finding Reproducibility,Of Result, Reproducibility,Of Results, Reproducibility,Reliabilities, Test-Retest,Reliability, Test-Retest,Result Reliabilities,Result Reliability,Result Validities,Result Validity,Result, Reproducibility Of,Results, Reproducibility Of,Test Retest Reliability,Validity and Reliability,Validity, Face

Related Publications

J S Saini, and S Mittal
October 1977, Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960),
J S Saini, and S Mittal
February 1975, Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960),
J S Saini, and S Mittal
January 1985, Vestnik oftalmologii,
J S Saini, and S Mittal
March 1976, American journal of ophthalmology,
J S Saini, and S Mittal
June 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science,
J S Saini, and S Mittal
January 1987, Fortschritte der Ophthalmologie : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft,
J S Saini, and S Mittal
November 2019, Biomedical optics express,
J S Saini, and S Mittal
February 1975, Archives d'ophtalmologie et revue generale d'ophtalmologie,
J S Saini, and S Mittal
January 1975, Archives d'ophtalmologie et revue generale d'ophtalmologie,
J S Saini, and S Mittal
July 1993, Medical & biological engineering & computing,
Copied contents to your clipboard!