Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. 1998

, and P Piedbois, and P Rougier, and M Buyse, and J Pignon, and L Ryan, and R Hansen, and B Zee, and B Weinerman, and J Pater, and C Leichman, and J Macdonald, and J Benedetti, and J Lokich, and J Fryer, and G Brufman, and R Isacson, and A Laplanche, and E Levy

OBJECTIVE The administration of fluorouracil (5-FU) by continuous intravenous infusion (CI) is an alternative to the bolus administration of 5-FU in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Although more than 1,200 patients have been enrolled onto randomized trials that compared these two treatment modalities, there is still no definitive evidence of an advantage of 5-FU CI, and the magnitude of this advantage, if any, is also controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to assess this benefit in terms of tumor response and survival, and to compare the toxicity profiles of these two modalities of administration of 5-FU. METHODS Individual data of 1,219 patients included in six randomized trials served as the basis for this meta-analysis, which was conducted by an independent secretariat in close collaboration with the investigators. RESULTS Tumor response rate was significantly higher in patients assigned to 5-FU CI than in patients assigned to 5-FU bolus (22% v 14%; overall response odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.41 to 0.75; P = .0002). Overall survival was also significantly higher in patients assigned to 5-FU CI (overall hazards ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.99; P = .04), although the median survival times were close. Multivariate analyses showed that randomized treatment and performance status were the only two significant predictors of tumor response, whereas the same plus primary tumor site were independent significant predictors of survival (patients with rectal cancer did somewhat better). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was more frequent in patients assigned to 5-FU bolus (31% v 4%; P < 10(-16)), whereas hand-foot syndrome was more frequent in the 5-FU CI group (34% v 13%; P < 10(-7)). CONCLUSIONS 5-FU CI is superior to 5-FU bolus in terms of tumor response and achieves a slight increase of overall survival. The hematologic toxicity is much less important in patients who receive 5-FU CI, but hand-foot syndrome is frequent in this group of patients.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007262 Infusions, Intravenous The long-term (minutes to hours) administration of a fluid into the vein through venipuncture, either by letting the fluid flow by gravity or by pumping it. Drip Infusions,Intravenous Drip,Intravenous Infusions,Drip Infusion,Drip, Intravenous,Infusion, Drip,Infusion, Intravenous,Infusions, Drip,Intravenous Infusion
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D005472 Fluorouracil A pyrimidine analog that is an antineoplastic antimetabolite. It interferes with DNA synthesis by blocking the THYMIDYLATE SYNTHETASE conversion of deoxyuridylic acid to thymidylic acid. 5-FU,5-FU Lederle,5-FU Medac,5-Fluorouracil,5-Fluorouracil-Biosyn,5-HU Hexal,5FU,Adrucil,Carac,Efudex,Efudix,Fluoro-Uracile ICN,Fluoroplex,Fluorouracil Mononitrate,Fluorouracil Monopotassium Salt,Fluorouracil Monosodium Salt,Fluorouracil Potassium Salt,Fluorouracil-GRY,Fluorouracile Dakota,Fluorouracilo Ferrer Far,Fluoruracil,Fluracedyl,Flurodex,Haemato-FU,Neofluor,Onkofluor,Ribofluor,5 FU Lederle,5 FU Medac,5 Fluorouracil,5 Fluorouracil Biosyn,5 HU Hexal,Dakota, Fluorouracile,Fluoro Uracile ICN,Fluorouracil GRY,Haemato FU
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000964 Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic Antimetabolites that are useful in cancer chemotherapy. Antineoplastic Antimetabolites
D015179 Colorectal Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the COLON or the RECTUM or both. Risk factors for colorectal cancer include chronic ULCERATIVE COLITIS; FAMILIAL POLYPOSIS COLI; exposure to ASBESTOS; and irradiation of the CERVIX UTERI. Colorectal Cancer,Colorectal Carcinoma,Colorectal Tumors,Neoplasms, Colorectal,Cancer, Colorectal,Cancers, Colorectal,Carcinoma, Colorectal,Carcinomas, Colorectal,Colorectal Cancers,Colorectal Carcinomas,Colorectal Neoplasm,Colorectal Tumor,Neoplasm, Colorectal,Tumor, Colorectal,Tumors, Colorectal
D016017 Odds Ratio The ratio of two odds. The exposure-odds ratio for case control data is the ratio of the odds in favor of exposure among cases to the odds in favor of exposure among noncases. The disease-odds ratio for a cohort or cross section is the ratio of the odds in favor of disease among the exposed to the odds in favor of disease among the unexposed. The prevalence-odds ratio refers to an odds ratio derived cross-sectionally from studies of prevalent cases. Cross-Product Ratio,Risk Ratio,Relative Odds,Cross Product Ratio,Cross-Product Ratios,Odds Ratios,Odds, Relative,Ratio, Cross-Product,Ratio, Risk,Ratios, Cross-Product,Ratios, Risk,Risk Ratios
D016019 Survival Analysis A class of statistical procedures for estimating the survival function (function of time, starting with a population 100% well at a given time and providing the percentage of the population still well at later times). The survival analysis is then used for making inferences about the effects of treatments, prognostic factors, exposures, and other covariates on the function. Analysis, Survival,Analyses, Survival,Survival Analyses
D016032 Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Works about clinical trials that involve at least one test treatment and one control treatment, concurrent enrollment and follow-up of the test- and control-treated groups, and in which the treatments to be administered are selected by a random process, such as the use of a random-numbers table. Clinical Trials, Randomized,Controlled Clinical Trials, Randomized,Trials, Randomized Clinical
D016896 Treatment Outcome Evaluation undertaken to assess the results or consequences of management and procedures used in combating disease in order to determine the efficacy, effectiveness, safety, and practicability of these interventions in individual cases or series. Rehabilitation Outcome,Treatment Effectiveness,Clinical Effectiveness,Clinical Efficacy,Patient-Relevant Outcome,Treatment Efficacy,Effectiveness, Clinical,Effectiveness, Treatment,Efficacy, Clinical,Efficacy, Treatment,Outcome, Patient-Relevant,Outcome, Rehabilitation,Outcome, Treatment,Outcomes, Patient-Relevant,Patient Relevant Outcome,Patient-Relevant Outcomes

Related Publications

, and P Piedbois, and P Rougier, and M Buyse, and J Pignon, and L Ryan, and R Hansen, and B Zee, and B Weinerman, and J Pater, and C Leichman, and J Macdonald, and J Benedetti, and J Lokich, and J Fryer, and G Brufman, and R Isacson, and A Laplanche, and E Levy
January 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology,
, and P Piedbois, and P Rougier, and M Buyse, and J Pignon, and L Ryan, and R Hansen, and B Zee, and B Weinerman, and J Pater, and C Leichman, and J Macdonald, and J Benedetti, and J Lokich, and J Fryer, and G Brufman, and R Isacson, and A Laplanche, and E Levy
June 1999, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al],
, and P Piedbois, and P Rougier, and M Buyse, and J Pignon, and L Ryan, and R Hansen, and B Zee, and B Weinerman, and J Pater, and C Leichman, and J Macdonald, and J Benedetti, and J Lokich, and J Fryer, and G Brufman, and R Isacson, and A Laplanche, and E Levy
October 1997, European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990),
, and P Piedbois, and P Rougier, and M Buyse, and J Pignon, and L Ryan, and R Hansen, and B Zee, and B Weinerman, and J Pater, and C Leichman, and J Macdonald, and J Benedetti, and J Lokich, and J Fryer, and G Brufman, and R Isacson, and A Laplanche, and E Levy
January 2001, Anticancer research,
, and P Piedbois, and P Rougier, and M Buyse, and J Pignon, and L Ryan, and R Hansen, and B Zee, and B Weinerman, and J Pater, and C Leichman, and J Macdonald, and J Benedetti, and J Lokich, and J Fryer, and G Brufman, and R Isacson, and A Laplanche, and E Levy
January 1993, Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology,
, and P Piedbois, and P Rougier, and M Buyse, and J Pignon, and L Ryan, and R Hansen, and B Zee, and B Weinerman, and J Pater, and C Leichman, and J Macdonald, and J Benedetti, and J Lokich, and J Fryer, and G Brufman, and R Isacson, and A Laplanche, and E Levy
September 1988, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology,
, and P Piedbois, and P Rougier, and M Buyse, and J Pignon, and L Ryan, and R Hansen, and B Zee, and B Weinerman, and J Pater, and C Leichman, and J Macdonald, and J Benedetti, and J Lokich, and J Fryer, and G Brufman, and R Isacson, and A Laplanche, and E Levy
September 1998, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al],
, and P Piedbois, and P Rougier, and M Buyse, and J Pignon, and L Ryan, and R Hansen, and B Zee, and B Weinerman, and J Pater, and C Leichman, and J Macdonald, and J Benedetti, and J Lokich, and J Fryer, and G Brufman, and R Isacson, and A Laplanche, and E Levy
October 1995, Cancer,
, and P Piedbois, and P Rougier, and M Buyse, and J Pignon, and L Ryan, and R Hansen, and B Zee, and B Weinerman, and J Pater, and C Leichman, and J Macdonald, and J Benedetti, and J Lokich, and J Fryer, and G Brufman, and R Isacson, and A Laplanche, and E Levy
February 1995, Cancer,
, and P Piedbois, and P Rougier, and M Buyse, and J Pignon, and L Ryan, and R Hansen, and B Zee, and B Weinerman, and J Pater, and C Leichman, and J Macdonald, and J Benedetti, and J Lokich, and J Fryer, and G Brufman, and R Isacson, and A Laplanche, and E Levy
October 1987, Cancer treatment reports,
Copied contents to your clipboard!